Abstract
Public project evaluation in the United States follows that projects are developed with constant checks and measurements to ensure that budgetary expectations, efficiency expectations, and output expectations are being met consistent with what was approved for the project. However, post-evaluation (also known as ex-evaluation) is not mandatory for constructing a project. Post-evaluation is a systematic approach of assessing and evaluating a project after its completion. Evidence suggests that there is no standardized system of post-evaluation across the branches of government, nor is there one that measures success. The logic model can fill this gap in post-evaluation. The logic model is flexible enough to measure a multi-variable project like that of the Pikeville Cut-Through, an under-researched and major public infrastructure project that has had its relevance questioned considering recent flooding throughout Pikeville, Kentucky in 2025. The logic model clearly demonstrates how success can be measured and analyzed during post-evaluation.
Semester/Year of Award
Spring 5-4-2026
Mentor
Matthew Howell
Mentor Department Affiliation
Government
Access Options
Open Access Thesis
Degree Name
Honors Scholars
Degree Level
Bachelors
Department
Government
Presentation
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/12C-mM1-pqOTVmPooV2lrIWR1qj7oHYrlzMhuySkj6cg/edit?slide=id.p#slide=id.p
Recommended Citation
Cantrell, Gavin, "Why Did Pikeville Blow Up that Mountain? Post-Evaluation on Public Projects in the United States" (2026). Honors Theses. 1139.
https://encompass.eku.edu/honors_theses/1139
